Which one is easier to believe? Abiogenesis (soup theory) or Frankenstein?

well the question obviously was intended to make a point by inuendo and not by intelligent arguement. If you did what you would have posted was billions upon untold billions of lighting strikes, millions of joules/km�/sec all of these happening to a water every second of every day for billions of years. Lipid content of the water reaching concentrations to form micelles. (shown in the lab to occur with just the ingredients you name)--and these lipids are very similiar to cell walls. Any chemical reaction (even that of DNA) has a finite probability of occuring--billions of reactions per second over billions of years--and the probability of the reaction is not only plausible--but likely. If you'd asked the question with accurate information I wonder what the answer would have been.